DRDGOLD’s economic performance should be assessed not only on the basis of its financial results, but also on the company’s integration into the communities in which it operates and the ways in which these communities benefit from its activities.
The group’s value added statement below illustrates DRDGOLD’s economic performance during the year under review.
For an in-depth look at the company’s operational and financial performance, please refer to the Annual Report at www.drdgold.com.
DRDGOLD is South Africa’s fourth largest gold producer. Revenue from the sale of gold rose by 4% to R1 991 million (2009: R1 911 million), largely as a result of a higher gold price received. Costs of materials and services increased by 9% to R1 233 million and the overall value added decreased by 3% to R958 million in a difficult operating year for the group. The biggest problems were encountered at Blyvoor where seismic damage to high-grade panels in the last quarter of the 2009 financial year and a nearly month-long wage-related strike in the first quarter of the 2010 financial year affected production. (See case study below: DRDGOLD proactive in seeking provisional judicial management for Blyvoor.)
This value was distributed as follows:
To sustain and grow its operations, DRDGOLD increased its reinvestment in the company by 26% to R281 million. Capital expenditure for the year amounted to R188 million. The breakdown is as follows:
DRDGOLD has its primary listing on South Africa’s JSE Limited and its secondary listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market in the United States. By far the largest percentage of shareholders, 60.7%, are in the United States, followed by South Africa at 23.7% and Europe at 15.4%. At 30 June 2010, institutions and bodies corporate held 91.2% of the 384 884 379 shares in issue.
DRDGOLD’s shares are very liquid with about 84% being held in free float. Around 75% of trading takes place on Nasdaq. Volumes traded and share prices recorded during the year under review are illustrated in the graphs below. Shareholders were paid R19 million in dividends during the year.
Value added is defined as the value created by the activities of a business and its employees and in the case of DRDGOLD is determined as the sale of precious metals less the cost of materials and services. The value added statement reports on the calculation of value added and its application to the shareholders in the group.
The statement shows the total value added and how it was distributed, taking into account the amounts retained and reinvested in the group for the replacement of assets and development of operations.
| 2010 | 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rm | % | Rm | % | |
| Value added | ||||
| Sale of precious metals | 1 991 | 1 911 | ||
| Less cost of materials and services | (1 233) | (1 133) | ||
| Value added by operations | 758 | 79 | 778 | 79 |
| Income from investments | 200 | 21 | 206 | 21 |
| Total value added | 958 | 100 | 984 | 100 |
| Value distributed | ||||
| Employees Salaries, wages and other benefits | 643 | 67 | 673 | 68 |
| Government Income taxation | 10 | 1 | 46 | 5 |
| Providers of capital Dividends to shareholders | 19 | 2 | 38 | 4 |
| Interest on borrowings | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Total value distributed | 677 | 71 | 761 | 77 |
| Reinvested in the group | 281 | 29 | 223 | 23 |
| Depreciation | 191 | 99 | ||
| Reinvested in the group | 90 | 124 | ||
| Total value distributed | 958 | 100 | 984 | 100 |
DRDGOLD’s black economic empowerment (BEE) strategy is aimed at broad-based transformation at all levels of the company. Plans are in place at all operations to ensure compliance with the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) and the Broadbased Socio-economic Empowerment Charter (the Mining Charter).
| Operation | Total purchases Rm | BEE component of total Rm | BEE spend as % of total |
| Blyvoor | 782 | 440 | 56.2 |
| ERPM | 64 | 51 | 78.9 |
| Crown | 459 | 273 | 59.6 |
| Ergo | 1 311 | 607 | 46.3 |
| Total | 2 616 | 1 371 | 52.4 |
* It should be noted that the data capturing system used by DRDGOLD does not make provision for breaking down procurement expenditure into the categories of capital goods, consumables and services.
The group has complied with the MPRDA as all its operations lodged applications for the conversion of their old order mining rights to new order mining rights before the deadline of 30 April 2009. All the conversion applications were formally accepted by the Department of Mineral Resources as being in line with the MPRDA and approvals are awaited. In terms of the MPRDA, companies may continue to operate under their current licences until their conversion applications are formally approved and the new order mining rights granted.
DRDGOLD is in compliance with the BEE equity target of 26% set by the Mining Charter for 2014. It achieved this goal in the 2007 financial year.
The company’s BEE partner, Khumo Gold, acquired a 15% interest in DRDGOLD SA in 2005, increasing this stake to 20% in 2006 when an additional 6% of equity was placed in an employee trust, the DRDSA Empowerment Trust, to benefit a broad group of historically disadvantaged employees. (See case study below: DRDSA Empowerment Trust – one of a kind in South African mining industry.)
DRDGOLD’s procurement policy gives BEE companies preferred supplier status. This means that these companies are on the group’s vendor list and, provided they are commercially competitive, they are given preference when contracts are awarded.
In total, DRDGOLD’s operations spent R2.6 billion on procurement in 2010, of which R1.4 billion (52.4%) went to BEE companies. The statistics provided in the table above include expenditure with state power utility Eskom and the Rand Water Board.
DRDGOLD has a 4% stake in Rand Refinery Limited which refines and sells all of its gold. Gold is refined to a purity of approximately 85% at the DRDGOLD operations. At Rand Refinery, the gold is purified to 99.9% and cast into troy ounce bars. On the same day as the gold is received, Rand Refinery sells the gold on DRDGOLD’s behalf at the London afternoon fixed price.
DRDGOLD made history in November 2009 when it became the first company in the South African mining industry to proactively request provisional judicial management. The application, in terms of the provisions of Section 427 of the South African Companies Act, was made to the country’s High Court to save the Blyvoor mine from the possible threat of liquidation.
The provisional judicial management order was granted on 10 November 2009. The period of provisional judicial management was successful and the order was lifted in April 2010.
The Financial Manager of Blyvoor, Mark Burrell, explains that the move was prompted by Blyvoor's inability to continue to sustain losses which had reached R27 million a month. These losses, which started in May 2009, were largely the result of:
Although the mine was restructured after consultation in terms of Section 189A of the Labour Relations Act in an attempt to deal with these circumstances, this did not deliver the expected turnaround as rapidly as had been anticipated.
Burrell says: “By seeking judicial management we ring-fenced Blyvoor and protected DRDGOLD. It demonstrated that we had identified the problems, which were beyond the control of the Board of Directors and management, and were asking for help. It was the correct action to take and sent out the right message.”
In terms of the order, the Master of the High Court appointed judicial managers with a wide range of powers to take whatever actions were necessary to save the business.
In the case of Blyvoor, Burrell explains, the mine was not allowed to settle any debts incurred prior to the granting of the order without approval from the judicial managers. With regard to any purchases made after that date, suppliers were paid on a cash-on-delivery basis. The mine was also prevented from entering into any contracts for future supplies while the order was in place.
Towards the end of the third quarter of the 2010 financial year, Blyvoor’s situation had improved and DRDGOLD applied to the High Court for the lifting of the provisional judicial management order. The application pointed out that:
On 13 April 2010, the High Court agreed to lift the provisional judicial management order with immediate effect. It was granted on condition that DRDGOLD's provision of a R15 million facility to Blyvoor, available from November 2009 but not accessed, remained in place.
At the time DRDGOLD CEO Niël Pretorius commented: "The provisional judicial management of Blyvoor has been a success; the company is able to pay its debts as and when they fall due for payment; it has turned the corner and is, once again, a successful concern."
DRDGOLD’s DRDSA Empowerment Trust is one of a kind in the South African mining industry and, the company believes, more advantageous to employees than the more conventional employee share ownership plan (ESOP).
To understand the DRDSA Empowerment Trust and how it came to be established, it is necessary to go back to 2005 when DRDGOLD’s black economic empowerment (BEE) partner, Khumo Gold, acquired a 15% interest in DRDGOLD SA. This operating subsidiary of DRDGOLD was especially formed to enable DRDGOLD to fulfil the BEE equity targets set by the South African Broad-based Socio-economic Empowerment Charter of 15% by 2009 and 26% by 2014.At the time that the 15% holding was acquired by Khumo Gold, the company was granted an option, exercisable over the next three years, to acquire a further 11% interest in DRDGOLD SA.
When Khumo Gold exercised this option in 2006, it chose only to acquire a further 5% of DRDGOLD SA, to bring its stake in the company to 20%. In the interest of promoting true broadbased empowerment, Khumo Gold decided to place the remaining 6% into an empowerment trust, for the benefit of the employees of the subsidiary companies of DRDGOLD SA.
DRDGOLD’s Executive Officer: Legal, Compliance and Company Secretary, Themba Gwebu, pays tribute to Khumo Gold for taking the initiative and suggesting that an empowerment trust be set up rather than an ESOP. “The point made was that when employees own shares directly they tend to sell their shares to take a profit in the short term. Effectively, then, the shares are a once-off benefit. With a trust, however, employees have the opportunity to receive regular benefits,” he explains.
The participants in the DRDSA Empowerment Trust are all fulltime employees of DRDGOLD SA companies, from categories 4 to 18 – some 4 000 people, close to 90% of whom are historically disadvantaged South Africans. It works differently from an ESOP because it is the Trust that directly owns 6% of the shares of DRDGOLD SA, not the employees.
A major strength of the Trust is that, unlike an ESOP, it makes provision for the beneficiaries of an employee who dies in a work-related incident to be treated as participants. This applies to the beneficiaries of all employees who have died on or after 30 June 2000. In addition, employees who have been retrenched or have retired (provided they worked for the company for at least five years before retirement) will remain beneficiaries. As Gwebu observes, this broad base means that the Trust has the potential to play a role in community upliftment.
Another strength is that the Trust has been set up in such a way that the empowerment of employees is not confined to monetary gains. It will extend to several employees acquiring administration and management skills as well as considerable insight into the financial side of business.
Nevertheless, the General Manager of Corporate Services, Barry de Blocq, says that the process of establishing the Trust has taken time because there was initial resistance to the idea. “The unions knew about ESOPs and how they worked. A trust was a different concept and it was necessary to break down barriers before the unions gave their buy-in and commitment and nominated their trustees. Credit must be given to our union representatives for their open-minded and progressive thinking in adopting this unique approach to employee empowerment.”
In all, 11 trustees were nominated: five from the National Union of Mineworkers, three from UASA – the Union, two from Khumo Gold and there is one independent trustee.
It is these trustees who will administer the Trust and make the necessary investment/disbursement decisions. DRDGOLD will play no part in the running of the Trust.What the company will provide to the trustees free of charge is a secretarial, financial and human resources service.
Once the Master of the High Court had accepted the nominees, the company ensured that the eight employee trustees were trained before they took up their duties and these trustees were involved in the choice of a trainer. At the time of the first payout from the Trust, the company, again with the involvement of the trustees, will make sure that employees are educated so that they understand how the Trust works.
Gwebu notes that it is not only employees who are set to gain from the establishment of the Trust, the company will benefit too because employees will know that through this vehicle they have a long-term interest in DRDGOLD SA and this will act as an incentive for them to work hard and contribute to the company’s growth.
It is expected that the trustees will start administering the Trust during the 2011 financial year. One of their first tasks will be to make decisions about the disbursement of the R3.5 million in income which was paid into the Trust following Crown’s repayment of a loan from DRDGOLD.
DRDGOLD Sustainable Development Report 2010